Mar 2021 : IRS Releases Federal Income Tax Data

View / Download March 2021 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


The IRS released individual federal income tax information for 2018, which was the first tax year after enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in December 2017. (Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income).

We frequently hear how the federal tax system is tilted toward the wealthy and was made more so by former President Trump’s TCJA. However, the 2018 data released by the IRS indicates that the federal income tax remains considerably progressive.

The following presents some of the information disclosed by the IRS.

The number of tax returns filed in 2018 increased from 2017. However, average tax rates fell across all income levels and total taxes paid declined by $65 billion.

The top 1 percent of taxpayers’ share of total taxes paid increased in 2018 by 1.6% to 40.1%. In fact, since 2001, the share of taxes paid by the top 1 percent rose from 33.2% of the total to 40.1%.

In 2018, the top 50 percent of taxpayers paid 97.1% of total taxes paid while the bottom 50% paid 2.9%.

And, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid more of the total taxes than the bottom 90 percent combined.

The top 1 percent paid a 25.4% average rate of tax in 2018, while the bottom 50% paid an average of 3.4%. The top 1 percent paid an average tax of $426,639 for the year; the bottom 50% paid an average of $626.

As noted above, as a result of the TCJA, average tax rates declined for all taxpayers. The bottom 50% – making $43,614 or less – saw a 15% drop in their average tax rate from 4.0% in 2017 to 3.4% in 2018.

For the top 1 percent of taxpayers – making $540,009 or more – the average tax rate fell 9% – from 26.8% in 2017 to 24.4% in 2018.

President Biden has proposed increasing federal tax rates applicable to higher income taxpayers.

Former President Obama once proposed a tax on those with $1 million or more in income. This was embraced by some, including billionaire Warren Buffett, who stated the wealthy often pay at lower rates due to favorable tax treatment on capital gains from investments, which are not available to most wage earners.

Federal income taxes are frequently a subject of lively discussion. It brings to mind the old adage – “It depends on whose ox is being gored.”


About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “IRS Releases Federal Income Tax Data”
View / Download March 2021 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Feb 2021 : Tribute to Ken Prather

View / Download February 2021 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


My good friend, Ken Prather, passed away on December 27, 2020. He was 87 years old.

Ken practiced Family Law for 57 years. He was a consummate professional. He knew the law inside-out and was passionate about serving his clients.

Ken was a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers since 1973. He was a Super Lawyer and was listed in “The Best Lawyers in America.”

He was Chair of the State Bar Family Law Section in 1984. Ken was one of the pioneers in the early days of the Section.

One of my early encounters with Ken was in 1984 when he chaired the Family Law Section, on which I then served. In July 1984, Congress enacted the first overhaul of divorce taxation since 1948. The Family Law Section’s Annual Summer Seminar was a month later – in August. I had previously been appointed by Ken as the first chair of the Section’s Tax Committee.

We presented a program at the Summer Seminar on the new law that featured two national divorce tax experts – Joe Ducanto of Chicago and Marjorie O’Connell of Washington D.C.

Ken was so excited and proud that the Section gave such a top-drawer presentation just a month after the highly significant law had been passed.

I realize that many of you were then just a gleam in your Daddy’s eye; but I know some will remember those days.

Ken had several notable divorce cases. I worked with him on some as his expert.

Ken once told me the story of his representation of Ms. Kretchmer. The case was set for trial shortly after Michigan passed the no-fault divorce law. Ms. Kretchmer alleged egregious fault on the part of her husband and wanted Ken to highlight it in the trial. Ken told her that fault was no longer a factor in divorce cases. She asked Ken if he believed in the power of prayer. He said “yes” and agreed to present the fault allegations.

That case established the precedent that fault can be taken into account as a factor in dividing property, spousal support, and custody.

Ken taught family law for 17 years at the University of Detroit Mercy. I had the honor of guest lecturing at his classes on how taxes affected family law.

About four years ago, Ken and I were working on a difficult case. Ken was then 83. At one point he sighed heavily and said that this was his last case. Six months later he called me to work on a new case. He so loved family law that it was difficult for him to bring down the curtain.

Ken was an avid reader and a patron of the arts. He possessed a lively sense of humor.

He was generous and compassionate. He cared about the well-being of others. He was a great person as well as a skilled attorney.

And, Ken was an outstanding athlete – playing college basketball at the University of Detroit. He also was an excellent tennis player.

It is difficult to say goodbye to a friend and so it is with Ken. But, it is consoling to know that he had a full life – leaving a loving family, fast friends, and a remarkable imprint in the area of law he so loved and was so devoted to.

Ken’s obituary included one of his favorite Reflections by William Penn:

“I shall pass through life but once. If therefore, there is any kindness I can show, or any good
 
I can do any fellow being, let me do it now! Let me not deter or neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again.”

Ken was exemplary of living Penn’s Reflection.


About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “Tribute to Ken Prather”
View / Download February 2021 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Aug/Sep 2022 : Estimated Tax Payments; Tax Refunds & Overpayments

View / Download Aug/Sept 2022 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


Estimated tax payments made – and/or taxes withheld – during the year of divorce may be a marital asset. Tax refunds or, overpayments applied to next year’s tax, attributable to tax payments made during marriage may also be a marital asset.

And, it may cut the other way – that is, estimated tax payments and/or taxes withheld may be less than the actual tax on marital income received and shared during the year of divorce.

In this regard, note the following:

  1. Separate Returns for Year of Divorce – Whether divorcing parties can file a joint return or must file separate returns depends on their marital status as of December 31. If divorced as of that date, they must file separate returns for their respective separate incomes and deductions.
  2. Estimated Payments Automatically Are Credited to the Husband – Since the husband’s social security number (SSN) is generally listed first on joint estimated payment vouchers (Form 1040ES) made during marriage, such payments will automatically be credited to him unless there is a written alternative provision agreed on by the parties.
  3. The same applies to tax overpayments on the parties’ last joint return applied to the following year’s tax.
  4. Estimated Tax Payments and Tax Withheld During Marriage Are Marital Funds – Absent unusual circumstances, estimated tax payments and tax withheld during marriage are made with marital money – essentially half by each party.

The above matters are often not addressed in divorce settlements. The following presents (1) observations on such tax payments and (2) applicable tax law.

Tax Payments Made During the Year of Divorce

Example – Assume the following alternative facts for joint estimated tax payments made by – and/or withheld on behalf of H – during the year of a divorce for which the judgment is entered on December 30.

So, in Case #1, H will receive a windfall unless W’s attorney identifies the overpayment and makes an offsetting adjustment. Half of H’s $10,000 overpayment was made with W’s share of marital funds.

In Case #3, it is H’s attorney who needs to (1) identify that H will pay $10,000 of his own funds on income equally shared with W and (2) make an offsetting adjustment. When paying the $10,000, H will, in effect, be paying both his and W’s $5,000 shares of the tax on marital income.

Agreement to Apportion Joint Estimated Tax payments – IRS Publication 504 – “Divorced or Separated Individuals” – provides that divorced parties may agree on the division of joint estimated tax payments made during marriage.

Because the IRS credits the account of the spouse who’s SSN appears first on the estimated tax voucher (Form 1040ES) – almost always the husband’s – if the other spouse (assume W) claims any of the joint estimated tax payments on a separate return, W should indicate the ex-spouse’s SSN on page one of her IRS Form 1040 in the designated space. If W has remarried, she should enter the current spouse’s SSN in the appropriate space and enter the ex-spouse’s SSN, followed by “DIV,” on the line at the bottom of page one, where estimated tax payment credits are claimed.

Tax Refunds and Overpayments Applied to Next Year’s Tax

It is common practice to provide for the division of tax refunds resulting from the parties’ final joint income tax return. But, in some cases, parties filing a joint return will apply all or a part of any tax overpayment to the following year’s tax rather than having it refunded. This frequently occurs when a return is on extension and filed after April 15 and the prior year overpayment is needed to cover current year tax to avoid the underpayment penalty.

The IRS has ruled that it will abide by an agreement of spouses who are no longer married regarding the apportionment of an overpayment of tax on a prior year’s joint income tax return that the parties elected to apply to the following year’s tax liability. Rev Rul 76-140.

However, here, too, because the IRS credits the account of the spouse whose SSN appears first on the tax return, if the other spouse claims any of the applied overpayment, the other spouse should indicate the ex-spouse’s SSN on page one of his or her IRS Form 1040 in the designated space. If the other spouse has remarried, he or she should enter the current spouse’s SSN in the appropriate space and enter the exspouse’s SSN, followed by “DIV,” on the line at the bottom of page one, where estimated tax payment credits are claimed.

Practice Pointers

  1. Discover Tax Situation – As part of discovery, the tax overpayment or underpayment status of the parties should be determined. This can often be provided by the parties’ tax preparer.
  2. Over Withholding – The owner of a closely-held business can arrange excessive tax withholding. If undetected, the money that should be in marital accounts to divide will instead accrue 100% to the owner as a tax refund. The excessive withholding can be done on the last day of the year. So, the fact that withholding was not excessive on a September 30 pay stub is not a reliable safeguard against withholding manipulation.
  3. Rather, the owner’s W-2 should be reviewed for the relationship between (1) income and (2) income tax withheld to discover whether there is excessive withholding.
  4. Specific Divorce Settlement Provisions – In addition to discovering the parties’ “tax situation,” the settlement agreement should include express provisions regarding matters such as division of refunds, splitting joint estimated tax on separate returns, and ensuring an equitable sharing of tax on marital income for the year of divorce.

IRS Publication 504 – “Divorced or Separated Individuals”

This an excellent 30 page summary of divorce taxation. It covers the following topics:

  • Filing Status
  • Exemptions
  • Alimony
  • QDROs & IRAs
  • Property Settlements
  • Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax

Publication 504 was updated in October 2021 and has a 2 page detailed index.

It is available for download at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irspdf/p504.pdf


About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “Estimated Tax Payments; Tax Refunds & Overpayments”
View / Download Aug/Sept 2022 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)