Recent Articles

Apr 2020 : Families First Coronavirus Response Act and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act

View / Download April 2020 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)

On March 18, 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) was enacted. It requires certain employers to provide up to eighty (80) hours (two weeks) of paid sick leave occasioned by COVID-19 and up to ten (10) weeks additional family medical leave at two-thirds regular pay to care for a child due to the closure of a school or child care facility.

FFCRA applies to certain public employers and private employers with fewer than 500 employees.

Small businesses with fewer than fifty (50) employees may qualify for an exemption from the requirement to provide family leave due to school or child-care closings if it would jeopardize the business’ viability.

Employees qualify for paid sick time if unable to work
due to:

  • A federal, state, or local quarantine order.
  • Advise from a health care provider to self-quarantine
  • Having COVID-19 symptoms and is seeking medical diagnosis.
  • Caring for an individual in COVID-19 quarantine.
  • Caring for a child whose school or child-care facility is closed due to COVID-19.

CARES

On March 27, 2020, CARES (the Act) was signed into law. It is intended as an economic stimulus to mitigate the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Act provides over $2 trillion in wide-ranging financial relief to hard-pressed medical centers, individuals, and small businesses.

As this article goes to press, there is speculation that an additional relief bill may be necessary due the catastrophic effects of COVID-19.

The following presents some of the more significant provisions of FFCRA and the Act affecting families.

Direct Payments to Individuals

How Much?

Individuals with a gross income of $75,000 or less who filed a 2019 or 2018 tax return will receive $1,200. Married couples with gross income of $150,000 or less will receive $2,400. For those .ling as head of household, the gross income limit is $112,500. In addition, $500 will be received for each child under the age 17, for whom a Social Security number was included on the tax return.

For those receiving Social Security but who did not have sufficient income to require .ling a tax return, the IRS will use the person’s SSA-1099, Social Security Bene.t Statement to determine the payment.

Phase-Out

There is a phase-out of the cash payment for single individuals with gross incomes between $75,000 and $99,000 and for married couples with gross incomes between $150,000 and $198,000. The phase-out is 5% of the gross income over the limit.

For example, for an individual with gross income of $85,000, the payment would be $700 -$1,200 – ($10,000 X 5%).

No payment will be received by those with gross incomes exceeding the $99,000/$198,000 upper phase-out limits.

When Will Payments Be Received?

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said most people will receive their checks within three weeks.

Many believe that mid to late April is a realistic time frame.

The Act provides that the government shall mail a paper notice within a few weeks of when the payment was sent.

Expanded Unemployment Benefits

Extra Payment

The Act provides that eligible workers will receive an additional $600 a week in excess of the state unemployment benefit.

Duration of Payments

The Act also extends the period during which unemployment can be drawn by 13 weeks. So, Michigan’s 20-week annual limit is increased to 33 weeks.

Eligible Workers

The Act expands the pool of workers eligible for unemployment benefits. Independent contractors, part-time workers, “gig” workers, and freelancers are newly eligible.

And, people who need to cease working due to COVID-19 also may qualify. So, if a facility providing child-care, or elderly care, shuts down because of coronavirus such that a person needs to stop working to provide the care, he/she is eligible for unemployment benefits.

Retirement Accounts

10% Penalty Relief

For withdrawals from IRAs or 401(k) accounts during 2020 necessary because of COVID-19, there will be no 10% early withdrawal tax for those under 59.5 years of age.

People qualify if they, a spouse, or dependent test positive, or if they experience other negative economic consequences due to the pandemic.

Relief For Federal Student Loan Payments

What Relief?

No payments are due until September 30 – a six-month reprieve. And, no interest accrues during the six months.


About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “Families First Coronavirus Response Act and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act”
View / Download April 2020 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Mar 2020 : Provisions of the 2019 SECURE Act Relevant to Family Law

View / Download March 2020 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


The SECURE Act of 2019

General

The SECURE Act was signed into law on December 20, 2019. “SECURE” is an acronym for “Setting Every Community
Up for Retirement Enhancement.” Most of its provisions (1) expand opportunities for accumulating retirement bene/ts
and (2) take e0ect January 1, 2020.

Penalty Free Withdrawals from 401(k)s and IRAs for Child Care Expenses

Under the SECURE Act, a parent expecting a child – including a newly adopted child – may withdraw up to $5,000 from a 401(k) account or an IRA to cover expenses associated with the child without incurring the 10% penalty tax on early withdrawals (generally, withdrawals before 59 1/2 years of age). For married couples, up to $10,000 can be withdrawn penalty-free.

Such withdrawals are still subject to regular federal and state income tax. And, of course, such withdrawals result in that much less growing tax-free for retirement.

But, for relatively young parents in a relatively low tax bracket, accessing funds to cover new child expenses can be quite beneficial.

And, for anyone adopting a child, the extra funds can offset some of the significant costs of adoption.

Use of 529 Plan Funds to Pay Student Loans

Internal Revenue Code Section 529 allows states to establish tax-advantaged savings programs that allow contributions to an account for a designated beneficiary’s qualified higher education expenses (QHEE).

Michigan has established the Michigan Education Savings Program (MESP) – a Section 529 program.
Distributions from such accounts – including earnings – are not taxable provided such distributions do not exceed the
beneficiary’s QHEE.

QHEE include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and equipment – including technology equipment – required for attendance at a qualified institution of higher education (as defined in the 1998 Amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 – generally, any public college or university).

Distributions for QHEE are limited to $10,000 per beneficiary annually. If there is more than one Section 529 account for a beneficiary – e.g., one maintained by each set of grandparents – the $10,000 limit applies to distributions from all accounts on a combined basis.

The SECURE Act expands QHEE to include payments on student loans. .is can be particularly beneficial if there is a balance in a 529 account when a student completes his/her education and has student loan debt – a not uncommon occurrence. The 529 funds can be used to pay the student loan. However, such payments are limited to $10,000 annually.


About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “Provisions of the 2019 SECURE Act Relevant to Family Law”
View / Download March 2020 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Feb 2020 : 2020 Federal Income Tax Rates & Brackets, Etc., and 2020 Michigan Income Tax Rate and Personal Exemption Deduction

View / Download February 2020 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


Federal Income Tax

The following are inflation adjusted tax rates and the standard deduction for 2020 as announced by the IRS (IR-
2019-180).

Tax Rate

The Michigan income tax rate remains unchanged at a 4.25% flat rate.

Personal Exemption

The number of personal exemptions a Michigan taxpayer could claim had previously been tied to the number claimed for federal tax purposes. With the elimination of federal tax personal exemptions, Michigan enacted Senate Bill 748 (Bill), signed by Governor Snyder on February 28, 2018.

Under the Bill, the reference to federal exemptions is removed and the Michigan personal exemption deduction is increased from the $4,000 2017 allowance as follows:

  • 2018 – $4,050
  • 2019 – $4,400
  • 2020 – $4,750
  • 2021 – $4,900

About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “2020 Federal Income Tax Rates & Brackets, Etc., and 2020 Michigan Income Tax Rate and Personal Exemption Deduction”
View / Download February 2020 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Jan 2020 : State of Michigan Tax Exemptions for Divorce Related Transfers of Real Property

View / Download January 2020 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


General

For most Michigan transfers of ownership of real property, there are two tax adverse consequences:

  1. The Michigan Real Estate Transfer Tax imposes a tax of $3.75 for every $500 of value transferred. Additionally, the county transfer tax rate is $.55 for every $500 of value transferred.
    .
    So, the total transfer tax on $50,000 of property transferred is $2,150.
  2. Transfers of Ownership result in the “uncapping” of the taxable value of the transferred property.
    .
    This can be significant since the annual increase in taxable value for property tax purposes is otherwise limited by law to 5% or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower.
    .
    So, for property held for several years which has appreciated significantly in value, a transfer will likely result in a substantial increase its taxable value for property tax purposes.

Exemptions Applicable to Divorce Related Transfers

The following are exemptions that avoid both (1) imposition of a transfer tax and (2) the uncapping of taxable value.

  1. Transfers pursuant to a judgment provided no money is ordered by the court to be paid as consideration for the transfer are exempt. MCL 207.526(l); MCL 211.27a(7)(h)
  2. Transfers between spouses creating or disjoining a tenancy by the entireties are also exempt. MCL 207.526(j); MCL 211.27a(7)

Observations

  1. Apparently, a divorce related transfer occurring after divorce–when the parties are no longer spouses–for which money consideration is paid–does not fall within either exemption.
    .
    In such an instance, no consideration should be specifically provided for the transfer.
  2. And, if relying on the “pursuant to judgment” exemption, it seems advisable to provide for the transfer in the divorce judgment instead of, or in addition to, the property settlement agreement.

About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “State of Michigan Tax Exemptions for Divorce Related Transfers of Real Property”
View / Download January 2020 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)

Dec 2019 : Ethical Responsibilities For Family Law Attorneys and Business Valuation Experts

View / Download December 2019 Article – PDF File

Tax Trends and Developments Column – Michigan Family Law Journal


At an American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) and Business Valuation Resources (BVR) conference earlier this year in Las Vegas (where else?), the respective ethical responsibilities of family law attorneys and business valuation (BV) experts were discussed.

It was stated that an attorney’s charge is to apply legal theory to a case and to diligently advocate on the client’s behalf. Doing so with diligence means being committed to the client’s best interests and being a zealous advocate for the client.

However, it was then noted that a BV expert’s charge is to assist the trier of fact. This is done by educating the court by providing an analysis based on observable data and facts performed with unbiased objectivity.

So, the attorney is a zealous client advocate and the expert is the issuer of an unbiased opinion of value.

Obviously, these are potentially conflicting roles.

The example used at the Conference was similar to the following:

Facts

• Attorney, representing H, engages Expert to value H’s business.
• Expert uses an earnings multiple of 4 arriving at a preliminary value of $400,000.
• After reviewing the preliminary value, Attorney strongly suggests reasons for using a multiple of 3, resulting in a value of $300,000. He exerts pressure on Expert to revise the preliminary value accordingly.

Query 1

What are Expert’s ethical responsibilities under these circumstances?

One of the five Fundamental Principles of the Code of Ethical Principles for Professional Valuers is as follows:

  • Objectivity – not to allow conflict of interest or un-due influence or bias to override professional or business judgement.”

Two of the “Threats” listed in the Code of Ethical Principles for Professional Valuers are as follows:

  • Advocacy threat – the threat that a professional valuer will promote a client’s or employer’s position to the point that his/her objectivity is compromised.”
  • Intimidation threat – the threat that a professional valuer will be deterred from acting objectively because of actual or perceived pressures, including attempts to exercise undue influence over the valuation opinion.”
    So, the Expert should carefully consider Attorney’s reasons for a lower multiple and then use the multiple that the Expert, in his/her professional judgment, believes is appropriate.

Query 2

What are Attorney’s ethical responsibilities under these circumstances?

Attorney should persuasively present his reasons for a different multiple to the Expert.

Having done so, Attorney should respect Expert’s obligation to independently use his/her professional judgment in determining the appropriate multiple and resulting value.

Observations

  • Because business values are often subject to compromise in divorce settlements, it is natural for the attorney for the business owner to want to start low and the attorney for the non-owner to start high.
  • But, the BV expert cannot ethically slant a value one way or another to suit the interests of a party.
  • It is important that both experts have access to the same data. Often, the expert for the business owner has access to more data. Sharing all data reduces the chances that the two experts will arrive at substantially different values.
  • Because business values are often subject to compromise in divorce settlements, it is natural for the attorney for the business owner to want to start low and the attorney for the non-owner to start high.
  • But, the BV expert cannot ethically slant a value one way or another to suit the interests of a party.
  • It is important that both experts have access to the same data. Often, the expert for the business owner has access to more data. Sharing all data reduces the chances that the two experts will arrive at substantially different values.

About the Author

Joe Cunningham has over 25 years of experience specializing in financial and tax aspects of divorce, including business valuation, valuing and dividing retirement benefits, and developing settlement proposals. He has lectured extensively for ICLE, the Family Law Section, and the MACPA. Joe is also the author of numerous journal articles and chapters in family law treatises. His office is in Troy, though his practice is statewide.

Download the PDF file below… “Ethical Responsibilities For Family Law Attorneys and Business Valuation Experts”
View / Download December 2019 Article – PDF File

Complete Michigan Family Law Journal available at: Michigan Bar website – Family Law Section (subscription required)